Comprehensive analysis of orbital lymphoma in a Turkish cohort: clinical characteristics, histological subtypes, treatment modalities, prognostic factors, and implications for management.

The study analysed the clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and survival outcomes of 97 consecutive patients with orbital lymphoma (OL) over a 25-year period at. The median age of the patients was 57.6 years, and 59.8% (n = 58) were male. Marginal zone lymphoma constitutes the most prevalent subtype, accounting for 67% of cases, whereas other common subtypes include diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, and T-cell lymphomas. Unilateral involvement was observed in the majority of cases (72.3%). Common clinical presentations included mass (30.9%), swelling (26.8%), and epiphora (11.3%). Of the patients, 7.2% received rituximab alone, 14.4% received radiotherapy alone, 48.5% received chemotherapy, 27.8% received radiotherapy plus rituximab, 22.7% received radiotherapy plus chemotherapy, and 5.2% underwent surgery as the first-line treatment. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 15.5% of patients experienced relapse or disease progression. The 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 84.1% and 79.1%, respectively. This study contributes to our understanding of OLs and provides a foundation for further investigations in this field. Male gender, presence of B symptoms, advanced stage, secondary orbital lymphoma, aggressive histological subtype, and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels were associated with poorer (either inferior or worse) progression-free survival.

A Rare Case of Subcutaneous Amyloidoma Associated with Localized Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma: Diagnostic Challenges and Treatment Considerations.

BACKGROUND AL amyloidomas are solitary, localized, tumor-like deposits of immunoglobulin light-chain-derived amyloid fibrils in the absence of systemic amyloidosis. A rare entity, they have been described in various anatomical sites, typically in spatial association with a sparse lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, ultimately corresponding to a clonal, malignant, lymphomatous disorder accounting for the amyloidogenic activity. Most frequently, the amyloidoma-associated hematological disorder corresponds to either a solitary plasmacytoma or an extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of MALT. Much rarer is the association with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, which by itself is usually a bone marrow-bound disorder with systemic burden. The almost anecdotic combination of an amyloidoma and a localized lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma deserves attention, as it entails a thorough diagnostic workup to exclude systemic involvement and a proportionate therapeutic approach to avoid overtreatment. A review of the literature provides an insight on pathogenesis and prognosis, and can assist both pathologists and clinicians in establishing optimal patient management strategies. CASE REPORT We herein report the incidental finding of a subcutaneous amyloidoma caused by a spatially related, similarly localized lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma diagnosed in a 54-year-old female patient with no other disease localizations and a complete remission following 2 subsequent surgical excisions. CONCLUSIONS Whatever the specific combination of an amyloidoma and the related hematological neoplasm, a multidisciplinary collaboration and a comprehensive clinical-pathological staging are warranted to exclude systemic involvement and identify patients with localized diseases who would benefit from local active treatment and close follow-up.

Current evidence on diagnosis and treatment of parotid gland lymphomas: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Parotid gland lymphoma (PGL) is a rare and challenging diagnosis. Different lymphomas can develop in the parotid gland, with the most common being the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, which originates directly from the glandular parenchyma. Other histologic subtypes arise from both intraglandular and extraglandular parotid lymph nodes. A consensus on diagnosis and treatment of PGL is still lacking, and published data is scarce and heterogeneous. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature, including studies published after 2001, when the WHO classification of lymphoid tumours was introduced. RESULTS: Twenty retrospective studies were included in the analyses, eight of which focused exclusively on MALT lymphomas. Final analysis included 612 cases of PGL, with a 1.68:1 F/M ratio. MALT lymphoma was the most common histology, followed by follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Most cases were low stages (IE/IIE acc. Ann Arbour, 76.5%) and only 10% of patients presented with symptoms, most commonly pain (4.8%) and B symptoms (2.2%). A high prevalence of associated autoimmune diseases was found, particularly Sjögren's syndrome, that affected up to 70% of patients with MALT lymphoma. In most cases diagnosis was achieved through parotidectomy (57.5%), or open biopsy (31.2%). Treatment strategies were either surgical, non-surgical or a combination of modalities. Surgery as a single-modality treatment was reported in about 20% of patients, supposing it might be a valuable option for selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our review showed that the diagnosis and treatment of PGLs is far from being standardized and needs further, more homogeneous reports to reach consensus.

NGS-based IgH gene rearrangement monitoring predicts relapse and guides maintenance therapy in DLBCL: A case report from indolent lymphoma to aggressive lymphoma.

This report describes a case of extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (ENMZL) of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma that transformed to diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in a 39-year-old female patient with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). The patient presented with MALT lymphoma in the thyroid tissue and DLBCL in the multiple site invasions, including the ovary, breast, and lymph nodes. We assessed the Ig gene rearrangement and mutation profile in lymphoma involved tissues and the collected stem cells. V(D)J sequence of the tumor clonotype detected in thyroid, ovary, and breast was identical, revealing a shared origin of the malignant lymphoma. Noticeably, a small percentage of tumor clonotype (the highest-ranking clonotype in tumor tissues) was detected in the stem cell sample, suggesting the malignant cells was residual in the stem cells, likely conferred disease relapse following ASCT. This patient recieved BTK inhibitor combined with radiotherapy to eradicate the residual tumor cells based on the V(D)J sequence monitoring after ASCT. Now the patient remains in complete remission following 12 months of ASCT.

Enhancing prognostication and personalizing treatment of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue is an indolent lymphoma originating from marginal zone B-cells and associated with chronic inflammation. EMZL demonstrates distinct genomic alterations according to the primary extranodal site of disease but commonly affects signaling pathways including NF-ĸB, B-cell receptor, and NOTCH. Treatment with radiation therapy is commonly implemented in localized diseases, and multiple agents are available for patients with advanced-stage diseases in need of therapy. Bendamustine with rituximab is a frontline platform associated with high efficacy. AREAS COVERED: Clinical features, diagnosis, genomics, models enabling risk stratification, treatment options, and future directions. EXPERT OPINION: The lack of consistent genotyping profile in EMZL precludes the development of tissue and circulatory biomarkers for the diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring of minimal residual disease. Furthermore, the biological heterogeneity observed in extranodal sites associated with overall limited genomic data prevents the testing of druggable pathways aiming for a personalized treatment approach. Future clinical trials should focus on EMZL considering the unique clinical characteristics in the eligibility criteria and response assessment to better inform efficacy of novel agents and delineate sequences of therapies.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of secondary ocular adnexal lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: To describe the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of secondary ocular adnexal lymphoma (OAL), and emphasise the impact of timely biopsy and systemic evaluation on the diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: The data of patients with secondary OAL in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (30 men and 24 women) were included in the study. The mean age at presentation was 60 years (median 62 years; range 37-83 years). The main symptoms included ocular mass (74%), periorbital swelling (43%), and proptosis (39%). The main histopathological types were mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (30%), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (28%), and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (18%). In particular, three patients exhibited different pathological types of ocular lymphoma compared to previously diagnosed systemic lymphoma. The most common site of ocular and systemic involvement was the orbit (85%) and lymph nodes (56%), respectively, and 25 (46%) patients had occult extraocular lesions. Additionally, the 5-year overall survival rate of the entire cohort was 56%, and significant differences were observed between the three main pathological types and stages of the disease (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Secondary OAL is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. That the disease is associated with a more aggressive pathological type is well established, indolent lymphoma is not uncommon. Furthermore, OAL and previously diagnosed systemic lymphoma may be pathologically distinct in some patients. Therefore, we recommend a prompt excision biopsy and a thorough systemic evaluation of patients with suspected OAL.

Watchful waiting is an acceptable treatment option for asymptomatic primary ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Primary ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (POAML) is the most common subtype of indolent ocular adnexal lymphomas. Although radiotherapy (RT) is the standard of care for localized POAML, it can occasionally lead to permanent side effects. Other treatment strategies, such as rituximab (R) monotherapy and immunochemotherapy, have been used for POAML treatment, but their long-term benefits and relative merits remain unclear. While watchful waiting (WW) is a potential option for some indolent lymphomas, the benefits of WW for POAML patients are also unclear. METHODS: We here retrospectively analyzed 75 patients who were diagnosed with POAML between 2008 and 2019 in the institutions of the Kyoto Clinical Hematology Study Group. RESULTS: Commonly involved sites were conjunctiva (42.7%), orbit (36.0%), and lacrimal gland (12.0%), and most patients (92.0%) presented with Ann Arbor stage IE disease. The treatment strategy was selected at the physicians' discretion. More patients without subjective symptoms by tumor mass were subjected to WW (29 patients), while more patients with tumor-derived subjective symptoms were treated by tumor-directed therapy (24 received focal RT, and 19 received R monotherapy). Complete response rates were 79.2% and 42.1% in the RT and R groups, respectively. At 60 months of follow-up, the estimated proportions of POAML patients not requiring new treatment were 69.4%, 85.2%, and 53.8% in the WW, RT, and R groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the time to start a new treatment between WW and RT groups (median: both not reached [NR], p = 0.187) and between WW and R groups (median: NR vs. 69.0 months, p = 0.554). No specific predictive factor for the future need of treatment was identified in the WW group. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate WW may be an acceptable treatment option for POAML, especially for asymptomatic patients.

[Splenic lymphoma, diagnosis and treatment]. / Lymphomes spléniques : diagnostic et prise en charge.

Some common clinical situations, such as splenomegaly or lymphocytosis, or less common, such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia, cold agglutinin disease, or cryoglobulinemia can lead to the diagnosis of splenic lymphoma. Splenic lymphoma is rare, mainly of non-hodgkinian origin, encompassing very different hematological entities in their clinical and biological presentation from an aggressive form such as hepato-splenic lymphoma to indolent B-cell lymphoma not requiring treatment such as marginal zone lymphoma, the most frequent form of splenic lymphoma. These entities can be challenging to diagnose and differentiate. This review presents different clinical and biological manifestations suspicious of splenic lymphoma and proposes a diagnosis work-up. We extended the strict definition of splenic lymphoma (lymphoma exclusively involving the spleen) to lymphoma thant can be revealed by a splenomegaly and we discuss the differential diagnosis of splenomegaly.

[Treatment and prognosis of primary ocular adnexal extranodal marginal zone mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: a report from a single center].

Objective: This study aimed to see how different initial treatment regimens affected the long-term prognosis of patients with extranodal marginal zone mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma confining to the ocular adnexal (OAML) . Methods: Between April 2008 and April 2019, 109 patients with initial mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue confining to ocular adnexal were evaluated and followed-up, and the prognosis of various initial treatment regimens were examined. Results: A total of 36 patients underwent complete surgical resection of the lesions, and 73 patients had residual lesions after surgery, of which 37 patients chose watchful waiting, and 36 patients chose treatment. The treatment regimen included local radiotherapy and systemic treatment (chemotherapy, immunochemotherapy, the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, etc.) , and no serious toxic and side effects were observed in patients receiving systemic treatment. The median follow-up time was 61 (10-142) months. The 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) of monocular involvement patients were 78.2% and 76.0% . The 5-year and 10-year PFS rates of patients with binocular involvement were 64.4% and 23.5%. There was significant diference in PFS between patients with monocular and binocular involvement (P=0.010) . Patients who received additional treatment had higher PFS than those patients in the watchful waiting group (P=0.046) . The 5-year PFS was 71.4% and 90.1% among patients in the watchful waiting group and those who received additional treatment, whereas the 10-year PFS was 63.5% and 75.1% , respectively. Patients with OAML were still a risk of disease progression after 5 years. Conclusions: Patients with binocular involvement OAML at the start of the disease had a poor prognosis, but treatment could reduce the risk of recurrence/progression. Systemic therapy is one of the first-line treatment options for patients with OAML, who require long-term monitoring.

[Gastric MALT lymphoma - from pathogenetic insights to consequent deescalation of therapy]. / Gastrale MALT-Lymphome ­ von pathogenetischen Erkenntnissen zu konsequenter Deeskalation der Therapie.

Gastric MALT- (mucosa-associated-lymphoid-tissue) lymphoma represents the most frequent gastrointestinal lymphoma. For decades, surgery and later on radiation and chemotherapy were regarded as established therapy. Some 30 years ago, the pathogenetic role of Helicobacter pylori infection for the development of gastric MALT-lymphoma became evident. During the following years, the pathogenetic insights were consequently implemented into clinical medicine. This lead to a radical change of the therapeutic approach to these lymphoma. Nowadays, Helicobacter pylori eradication is the internationally established therapy of first choice. It is followed by lymphoma regression in most cases. The long-term prognosis of patients after exclusive eradication therapy is excellent, even if endoscopic and/or histological residuals persist and a watch-and-wait strategy is favored.The pathogenetic insights und their clinical application implicated a consequent deescalation of therapy of gastric MALT-lymphoma. This review summarizes the single steps of this development and gives a recommendation for the actual management of patients with gastric MALT lymphoma.

Treatment and prognosis of primary ocular adnexal extranodal marginal zone mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: a report from a single center / 中华血液学杂志

Objective: This study aimed to see how different initial treatment regimens affected the long-term prognosis of patients with extranodal marginal zone mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma confining to the ocular adnexal (OAML) . Methods: Between April 2008 and April 2019, 109 patients with initial mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue confining to ocular adnexal were evaluated and followed-up, and the prognosis of various initial treatment regimens were examined. Results: A total of 36 patients underwent complete surgical resection of the lesions, and 73 patients had residual lesions after surgery, of which 37 patients chose watchful waiting, and 36 patients chose treatment. The treatment regimen included local radiotherapy and systemic treatment (chemotherapy, immunochemotherapy, the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, etc.) , and no serious toxic and side effects were observed in patients receiving systemic treatment. The median follow-up time was 61 (10-142) months. The 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) of monocular involvement patients were 78.2% and 76.0% . The 5-year and 10-year PFS rates of patients with binocular involvement were 64.4% and 23.5%. There was significant diference in PFS between patients with monocular and binocular involvement (P=0.010) . Patients who received additional treatment had higher PFS than those patients in the watchful waiting group (P=0.046) . The 5-year PFS was 71.4% and 90.1% among patients in the watchful waiting group and those who received additional treatment, whereas the 10-year PFS was 63.5% and 75.1% , respectively. Patients with OAML were still a risk of disease progression after 5 years. Conclusions: Patients with binocular involvement OAML at the start of the disease had a poor prognosis, but treatment could reduce the risk of recurrence/progression. Systemic therapy is one of the first-line treatment options for patients with OAML, who require long-term monitoring.

Novel Therapies for Follicular Lymphoma and Other Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas.

OPINION STATEMENT: When selecting therapy for patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) including follicular (FL), marginal zone (MZL), small lymphocytic (SLL), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), there are several factors to consider. With a median age around 70 at diagnosis, many patients have accumulated comorbid conditions that may limit treatment options. Although incurable for most, iNHL is a chronic disease with a median overall survival measured in years to decades. This long natural history changes the risk-to-benefit balance with a lower acceptance of toxicity early in the treatment course compared to that of aggressive lymphomas. Despite a recent rapid increase in available therapies, overall progress in iNHL has been slow for several reasons. Initial trials grouped iNHLs together making it challenging to appreciate the differential activity among subtypes. We have not been able to develop prognostic models that maintain validity in the era of chemotherapy-free options. Predictive markers have been elusive and without identified molecular signatures, it is challenging to select and sequence therapy. With these clinical factors in mind, in addition to the heterogeneity among and within iNHLs, I do not have a standard treatment algorithm and feel each patient should have an individualized treatment approach. This review focuses on recent updates and controversies in the management of iNHL with a focus on FL and MZL.

Primary gastric non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Recent advances regarding disease pathogenesis and treatment.

Primary gastric lymphomas (PGLs) are distinct lymphoproliferative neoplasms described as heterogeneous entities clinically and molecularly. Their main histological types are diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or mucosa-associated lymphoma tissue. PGL has been one of the main fields of clinical research of our group in recent years. Although gastric DLBCLs are frequent, sufficient data to guide optimal care are scarce. Until today, a multidisciplinary approach has been applied, including chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy or a combination of these treatments. In this minireview article, we provide an overview of the clinical manifestations, diagnosis and staging of these diseases, along with their molecular pathogenesis and the most important related clinical published series. We then discuss the scientific gaps, perils and pitfalls that exist regarding the aforementioned studies, in parallel with the unmet need for future research and comment on the proper methodology for such retrospective studies. Aiming to fill this gap, we retrospectively evaluated the trends in clinical presentation, management and outcome among 165 patients with DLBCL PGL who were seen in our institutions in 1980-2014. The study cohort was divided into two subgroups, comparing the main 2 therapeutic options [cyclophosphamide doxorubicin vincristine prednisone (CHOP) vs rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP)]. A better outcome with immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP) was observed. In the next 2 mo, we will present the update of our study with the same basic conclusion.

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment and Evolution of Splenic and Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphomas-Retrospective and Multicentric Analysis of Portuguese Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of Splenic (SMZL) and Nodal (NMZL) Marginal Zone Lymphoma is not consensual. Histologic transformation (HT) to aggressive lymphoma is a poorly understood event, with an unfavorable outcome. OBJECTIVES: Describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, outcomes and incidence of HT. METHODS: Characteristics of patients with SMZL and NMZL consecutively diagnosed in 8 Portuguese centers were retrospectively reviewed. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to first systemic treatment (TTFST), frequency of HT and time to transformation (TTT). RESULTS: This study included 122 SMZL and 68 NMZL, most of them received systemic treatment: 55.4% and 76.5%, respectively. Splenectomy was performed in 58.7% of patients with SMZL. Different treatment protocols were used. OS or TTFST did not differ significantly according to treatments. Given the small sample size, no conclusion can be made concerning the role of Rituximab in the treatment of NMZL and SMZL based in these results. HT was documented in 18 patients, mainly in SMZL, with a cumulative incidence at 5 years of 4.2%. We confirmed that age is a prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Randomized prospective trials are needed to standardize treatment in MZL. Patients with HT did appear to have shorter OS in comparison with those who did not experience HT (OS 5 years of 68.4% vs. 80.4%), but the number of HT was too small to reach statistical significance.

Watch-and-wait or immediate immunotherapy/immunochemotherapy in patients with phase IE primary pulmonary MALT lymphoma? A multicenter retrospective study.

Primary pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is rare, and the optimal frontline treatment has not taken shape so far. It is still debatable whether the watch-and-wait (W&W) policy is beneficial to patients, especially in the early stage. This study was to compare the efficacy of W&W with rituximab single agent or combined chemotherapy (R/R-Chemo) on primary pulmonary MALT patients with localized disease. Clinical characters and effect on 28 patients with primary pulmonary MALT (IE phase) were analyzed. Among the 28 patients, 14 were grouped into W&W cohort, and 14 were immediately treated with R/R-Chemo. The median follow-up duration was 62 months. The estimated median time to treatment failure (TTF) in the W&W cohort and immediate R/R-Chemo cohort was 29 months and 59 months, which were not significantly different (P = 0.667). The estimated median time of overall survival (OS) in the W&W cohort and immediate R/R-Chemo cohort was 78 months and 76 months, which were also not statistically significant (P = 0.696). Concerning prognosis, there is no difference between patients with primary pulmonary MALT (IE phase) treated with W&W and with timely R/R-Chemo.

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma associated with hepatitis B virus infection, remission after viral treatment, and splenectomy: A case report and review of the literature.

We report the case of a patient diagnosed with a splenic marginal zone lymphoma with a simultaneous finding of hepatitis B virus infection, who responded to antiviral treatment and splenectomy. We highlighted this association described in the literature and its possible causal role, as well as the available therapeutic choices.

How do we sequence therapy for marginal zone lymphomas?

Marginal zone lymphomas are indolent diseases. Overall survival rates are very good, but patients tend to relapse and may do so several times. The concept of treatment sequencing is therefore important and necessary to preserve adequate organ function and to avoid excessive toxicity, with the final goal of achieving long survival times. Systemic treatments and chemotherapy are considered to be an option in multiply relapsing disease, in cases that are in an advanced stage at presentation or relapse, and in cases where initial local treatments lack efficacy. Targeted agents and new drugs can provide chemotherapy-free alternatives in heavily pretreated patients.

Low-dose radiotherapy (2×2 g) versus low doses and rituximab in the treatment of marginal zone b-cell lymphoma previously untreated.

Radiotherapy (RT)is considered the treatment of choice in patients with Extra-nodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) at early stage, but the presence of late toxicities has been limited the acceptance. Recently, low doses of RT LDR) (2 x 2 Gy) and the use of limited fields has been observed that retain the efficacy but eliminate toxicities; rituximab is considered as a single agent useful in these setting of patients. Thus, we conducted a open label study to evaluate the use of LDR compared with LDR and rituximab, in a large number of patients without previous treatment. METHODS: Patients with pathological diagnosis or(EMZL)), stage I, without previous treatment, were allocated in a proportion 1:1 to received LDR) that were compared with a group that received LDR and rituximab. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients were recruit ; overall response rate and complete response were : 58(98.3%) and 54 (96.4 %)in patients whose respectively in LDR that were no statistical different to the observed in the LDR + R arm: 53 (96.3%) and 51 (92.75 %) respectively. Actuarial curves at 5-years show that progression-free survival in LDR arm were: 98.4% (95% Confidence interval (CI): 93%-108%) and OS were 97.2% (95%CI: 92%-110%), that did no show statistical difference with the LDR-R arm: 96.4% (95%CI: 90%-110%), and 98.5%(95%CI:92%-107%) respectively. Univariate analysis did not show any statistical differences in the analysis of prognostic factors. Acute and late toxicities were not observed. CONCLUSION: We conclude that LDR will be considered as the treatment of choice in patients with EMZL, in early stage, localized in head and neck anatomical sites; because response and outcome were excellent, without any toxicity, addition of rituximab did not improve results and outcome.

Risk adapted approach: How to treat splenic marginal zone lymphoma in resource-poor settings? - The real-life experience of a Brazilian cancer treatment center.

BACKGROUND: Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare lymphoid B-cell malignant neoplasm with primary involvement of the spleen. It is a chronic disease, of indolent behavior and prolonged survival. However, 25% of cases have higher biological aggressiveness, propensity for histological transformation to high grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and shortened survival. Recognition of these cases of reserved outcome is important for selecting a risk-adapted therapeutic approach in a resource-poor settings. METHODS: We described clinical and epidemiological characteristics, survival analysis and prognostic factors in a retrospective cohort of 39 SMZL patients, treated in Latin America. RESULTS: We observed a predominance of female (71.8%), median age of 63 years and higher incidence of B symptoms (56.4%) and extra-splenic involvement (87.1%) than in European and North-American series. With a median follow-up of 8.7 years (0.6-20.2 years), estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 76.9% and 63.7%, respectively. Factors with adverse prognostic impact on OS and PFS were Hb < 100 g/L, platelet count < 100 x 109/L, albumin < 3.5 g/dL, LDH > 480 U/L and high-risk Arcaini and SMZL/WG scores. Despite a relative low number of patients, no superiority was observed among the therapeutic regimens used including rituximab monotherapy, splenectomy and cytotoxic chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Therefore, in resource-poor settings, where access to immunotherapy is not universal for all SMZL patients, we suggest that first-line should consist on rituximab therapy for elderly patients or with high surgical risk or with at least 1 risk factor identified in our study. Remainders can be safely managed with splenectomy.

Rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma of childhood and adolescence: A consensus diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pediatric-type follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and nonanaplastic peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Pediatric-type follicular (PTFL), marginal zone (MZL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) account each for <2% of childhood non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We present clinical and histopathological features of PTFL, MZL, and few subtypes of PTCL and provide treatment recommendations. For localized PTFL and MZL, watchful waiting after complete resection is the therapy of choice. For PTCL, therapy is subtype-dependent and ranges from a block-like anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL)-derived and, alternatively, leukemia-derived therapy in PTCL not otherwise specified and subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma to a block-like mature B-NHL-derived or, preferentially, ALCL-derived treatment followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first remission in hepatosplenic and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma.